Environmental liabilities: England

Environmental liabilities: England

Legislation includes:

The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations 2009: England

The Environmental Damage Regulations 2009 came into force on the 1st March 2009.

The regulations implement the European Environmental Liability Directive 2004 in England (other legislation is in preparation to cover other parts of the UK).  The legislation reinforces protection already afforded to strictly protected species listed on the Birds and Habitats Directives, but perhaps more importantly, the Regulations provide some protection for the habitats of species which are not strictly protected by the Birds and Habitats Directive outside of designated sites.

For example, the Regulations apply to the habitat of birds listed on Annex I of the Birds Directive whether inside or outside an SPA (or SSSI). This includes some common species such as kingfisher, golden plover and peregrine, plus other regularly occurring migratory birds, many of which are common such as the chiff chaff, willow warbler, redwing, fieldfare and blackcap.  Specific habitats listed in the Habitats Directive such as estuaries and heathland are afforded protection from damage whether inside or outside a designated site. Similarly, habitats used by species listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes (for example, habitat for stag beetle, or streams supporting white clawed crayfish or bullhead) receive the same protection.

The Regulations mean firstly that operators may be required to demonstrate measures to prevent negligent or intentional damage to these species or habitats, and secondly, where an operator’s action causes damage, they may be obliged to remediate it.

Environmental damage in the case of protected species and habitats is defined as damage having a ‘significant adverse effect on reaching or maintaining the favourable conservation status of the protected species or natural habitat’  taking into account factors such as their existing conservation status, capacity to regenerate and their role within the wider ecological community.  Depending on how this is interpreted by Natural England, this has potential to be far reaching and include a wide range of actions, including those having indirect effects as well as the more obvious direct effects.  Where applicable, the required remediation measures would be determined by the enforcing authority and implemented by the operator proven to have caused the environmental damage.

[back to top]

Environmental Sanctions: England

In the face of breaches of wildlife legislation, Natural England and the Environment Agency have previously had the option of issuing warning letters or proceeding to full criminal prosecution.  Both organisations now have greater flexibility of enforcement under The Environmental Civil Sanctions (England) Order 2010 and The Environmental Sanctions (Misc. Amendments) (England) Regulations 2010.

Under these Regulations, Natural England and the Environment Agency will be able to halt illegal activities, to order the restoration of environmental damage and to impose fines where legislation has been breached. The fines may be up to £250,000.  These changes should mean that an appropriate level of action can be undertaken when wildlife law is breached.  This may mean that, in cases of minor infringement, a fine will be imposed rather than the warning letters which are currently used in such situations.

[back to top]

Thomson's wildlife
on site handbook

All you need to know about ecology and development - in a single, clear and concise book.

thumbnail

For help with your project please contact us or ask us to contact you:

call me back